[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]



Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> On 2006-04-30, Steve Lamb penned:
> 
>>    No, not might.  Most people.  Some might choose bad investments.
>>    But by and large it is extremely difficult to do worse than
>>    Social Security.  I think it's so bad that putting the money
>>    in a simple 3% interest savings account offered by any bank
>>    yields more in the end.
> 
> 
> Even though I just ripped into you a few posts ago, you do have a
> point here.  It would be interesting if social security could be
> altered so that (this is just off the top of my head here, so I'm sure
> it's not by any means perfect, but maybe the glimmering of an idea):
> 
> 1) By default, everyone pays into SS
> 
> 2) Instead of the current system, every person has an individual SS
> account, from which their own retirement would later be drawn
> 
> 3) That account would invest in CDs or some other extremely low-risk
> setup.  Perhaps it could work like a bank instead, with an interest rate
> based on balance (I'll admit I don't know enough about how banks work to
> be sure that could work).
> 
> 4) There would be a non-trivial, optional exam.  If one passed the exam,
> one could choose what to do with the money that would typically be given
> to SS: leave it there, invest it, spend it on wine, women and song.
> Whatever.  But the exam would have to be good enough to ensure that the
> taker is financially well-educated, and taking the exam would have to be
> expensive enough to be a deterrent (shouldn't be a problem since it
> would have to cover the costs of formulating the exam, etc).
> 
> The main trouble I see with such an approach is that someone could be
> financially brilliant in a way not yet commonly accepted, and thereby
> flunk the test.  But I imagine someone like that could "fake it"
> through the exam anyway by knowing the "right" answers.
> 

I like your idea, except for point 4.  In fact, why does the government
need to be involved in it at all?  Just to mess it up?

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: