[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Just how do I fix this??



On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 23:41 -0700, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> I am trying to fix an unmet dependancy from my Backports installation of KDE 
> 3.5. I am guessing that something is not allowing the overwriting 
> of /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/kioslave/audiocd.docbook. How can I force this 
> to happen?
[...snip...]
> (Reading database ... 130073 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace kdemultimedia-kio-plugins 4:3.3.2-1 
> (using .../kdemultimedia-kio-plugins_4%3a3.5.0-2bpo1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement kdemultimedia-kio-plugins ...
> dpkg: error 
> processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdemultimedia-kio-plugins_4%3a3.5.0-2bpo1_i386.deb 
> (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/kioslave/audiocd.docbook', 
> which is also in package kdebase-kio-plugins
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/kdemultimedia-kio-plugins_4%3a3.5.0-2bpo1_i386.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

        dpkg -i --force-overwrite /var/cache/apt/archives/kdemultimedia-kio-plugins_4%3a3.5.0-2bpo1_i386.deb

This will cause dpkg to over write the files. As you are fixing a backports issue, I'd just over write it.

Then go and do "apt-get upgrade" or "apt-get dist-upgrade" and your machine should carry on from there.

I copied to you as I am not sure if you are sub'd to Debian-User.

-- 
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net

The technology that is 
Stronger, Better, Faster: Linux

Use Debian GNU/Linux, its a bazaar thing

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the 
National Security Agency may have read this email 
without warning, warrant, or notice, and certainly 
without probable cause. They may do this without 
any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no 
recourse nor protection.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: