[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian-user and mutt...



On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:07:54PM -0500, Erik Karlin wrote:
> To sort of interrupt this thread as it seems to be somewhat resolved,
> does anyone know why DU is the only mailing list that mutt can correctly
> identify signed messages? How and where is that configured, and how can
> I check/debug that one.

In my .muttrc, I have the following and it works for every mailing list:


set pgp_decode_command="gpg %?p?--passphrase-fd 0? --no-verbose \
    --batch --output - %f"
set pgp_verify_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch --output - \
    --verify %s %f"
set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --passphrase-fd 0 --no-verbose \
    --batch --output - %f"
set pgp_sign_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch --output - \
    --passphrase-fd 0 --armor --detach-sign \
    --textmode %?a?-u %a? %f"
set pgp_clearsign_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch --output - \
    --passphrase-fd 0 --armor --textmode --clearsign %?a?-u %a? %f"
set pgp_encrypt_only_command="/usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg --batch \
    --quiet --no-verbose --output - --encrypt --textmode --armor \
    --always-trust --encrypt-to 0x[mykeyid] -- -r %r -- %f"
set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="/usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg \
    --passphrase-fd 0 --batch --quiet --no-verbose --textmode \
    --output - --encrypt --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor --always-trust \
    --encrypt-to 0x[mykeyid] -- -r %r -- %f"
set pgp_import_command="gpg --no-verbose --import -v %f"
set pgp_export_command="gpg --no-verbose --export --armor %r"
set pgp_verify_key_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch \
    --fingerprint --check-sigs %r"
set pgp_list_pubring_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch \
    --with-colons --list-keys %r"
set pgp_list_secring_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch \
    --with-colons --list-secret-keys %r"
set pgp_autosign=yes
set pgp_sign_as=0x[mykeyid]
set pgp_replyencrypt=yes
set pgp_timeout=1800
set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"


HTH

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: