[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xcdroast problem



On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:37:43 +0200
andras.lorincz@gmail.com wrote:

> I wanted to write a cd with xcdroast, but could not. Here is what is
says to 
> me:
> 
> Calling: /usr/lib/xcdroast/bin/xcdrwrap CDRECORD dev= "ATAPI:0,0,0" 
> gracetime=2 fs=8192k -v driveropts=burnfree  speed=16 -dao -eject -pad
-waiti 
> tsize=360662s -
> 
> cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.10
> cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer.
> cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or
> Solaris.
> scsidev: 'ATAPI:0,0,0'
> devname: 'ATAPI'
> scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0
> Warning: Using ATA Packet interface.
> Warning: The related Linux kernel interface code seems to be
> unmaintained.
> Warning: There is absolutely NO DMA, operations thus are slow.
> SCSI buffer size: 64512
> cdrecord: Drive does not support SAO recording.
> NOTE: this version of cdrecord is an inofficial (modified) release of
> cdrecord
> cdrecord: Illegal write mode for this drive.
> and thus may have bugs that are not present in the original version.
> 
> Then I try to write the cd with k3b and it say to me:
> 
> Can't find a suitable writer. You will only be able to create an
> image.
> 
> But if I restart, k3b sees the writer and there is no problem. If
> trying again with xcdroast, then the same story. If launch cdrecord
> -scanbus dev=ATA, get this: 
> 
> scsibus1:
>         1,0,0   100) 'TEAC  ' 'CD-W540E    ' '1.0D' Removable CD-ROM
>  cdrecord: Warning: controller returns wrong size for CD capabilities
>  page.
>         1,1,0   101) 'ASUS  ' 'CD-S520/A   ' '1.6K' Removable CD-ROM
>         1,2,0   102) *
>         1,3,0   103) *
>         1,4,0   104) *
>         1,5,0   105) *
>         1,6,0   106) *
>         1,7,0   107) *
> 
> I did not use xcdroast for some time and had no problems earlier? So
> it is an xcdroast bug or not because k3b works fine.
> 
> P.S. I'm using 2.6.10 kernel without ide-scsi option in grub.

Andras,

Look at you scanbus info, and look at the error output. There is a
glaring difference in the 2. Particularly the "scsidev" output.

-- 
Rodney D. Myers <rdmyers@MtPalomar.net>	
Registered Linux User #96112
ICQ#:     AIM#:       YAHOO:
18002350  mailman452  mailman42_5

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a 
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
        Ben Franklin - 1759

Attachment: pgp4Z50xrkGn8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: