Re: Re: no devices or drivers dir under /proc/bus/usb
here's a lessing of /etc/fstab and the output of mount:
/etc/fst# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
<snip>
/dev/sdd3 /test ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/sde1 /mnt/fat32 vfat defaults,gid=1003,umask=0000 0
2
none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0
usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs defaults 0 0
that's an edited version, I took out unnecessary drives, etc.
/dev/sde1 should be the USB drive in question, I have an all scsi system.
Here's mount:
/dev/sda2 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
/dev/sda1 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
/dev/sdb1 on /win95 type ext3 (rw)
/dev/sdc1 on /usr type ext3 (rw)
/dev/sdc2 on /home type ext3 (rw)
/dev/sdd1 on /var type ext3 (rw)
/dev/sdd2 on /mp3 type ext3 (rw)
/dev/sdd3 on /test type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw)
none on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
usbdevfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw)
(The win95 dir is for wine, FYI :) )
Does that help?
VTK
>
> From: Patrick Lesslie <patricklesslie@iinet.net.au>
> Date: 2004/01/22 Thu AM 07:14:45 CST
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: no devices or drivers dir under /proc/bus/usb
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:07:00AM -0600, Vale Kenny wrote:
> > According to linux-usb.org, after I've mounted usbdevfs and
> > loaded the necessary usb modules, I should have two directories
> > under /proc/bus/usb, devices and drivers. I have naught.
> > I completely out of ideas. Here are the logs and various bits
> > of information I thought would be useful.
>
> Can you confirm that it is mounted? You want this in /etc/fstab:
> none /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs defaults 0 0
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Jon Postel, you are missed.
http://www.isi.edu/div7/people/postel.home/
Reply to: