[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian sid and "risk management"



On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 14:42 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-12-25 at 10:05 -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > > Sid is probably not the right choice if you need to run a nuclear
> > > defense grid, but for day to day work on the desktop and even on
> > > servers, it's plenty stable enough in my experience.
> 
> Running unstable on an outward-facing server is probably a bad idea
> because security holes could be present.
> 
> The general advice I've heard on this list is run wooody+security 
> updates + backports.

Well, when a security hole in an application is found the next version
of the application usually includes a fix, so by keeping the system
regularly updated with the newest versions of a package it SHOULD keep
most of the holes plugged.

woody + security is definitely the safest bet, but see my previous
statements about running a nuclear defense grid or something less
critical.

-- 
Alex Malinovich
Support Free Software, delete your Windows partition TODAY!
Encrypted mail preferred. You can get my public key from any of the
pgp.net keyservers. Key ID: A6D24837

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: