Filesystem recovery with ReiserFS
On Fri, Aug 13 at 08:52PM +0800, Katipo wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:23:28AM -0400, James Herschel wrote:
> >>What should I do next time?
> >
> >Not use reiserfs.
>
> What's wrong with reiserfs?
> I've been running it for three years without a hiccup.
i'd still love to see an informed answer (i.e. not from marc
wilson) on why reiserfs should be avoided. the instance
discussed here may not have been recovered using the best means,
i don't know. but blanket assertions (avoid it) and emotional
tirades (your problem) are irresponsible noise.
- is there significant reason to shun reiserfs?
- what's the optimal/recommended recovery method?
--
I use Debian/GNU Linux version 3.0;
Linux boss 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i586 unknown
DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #27 from Will Trillich <will@serensoft.com>
:
Would you like RXVT to have more than 80 COLUMNS OR 24 ROWS? For an
rxvt session, running under X, specify how many rows and columns
you want:
rxvt -g 132x30 &
Try "man rxvt" for more info.
Also see http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ...
Reply to: