Re: NFS mount very very slow
Dear John et al,
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:48 pm, John Summerfield wrote:
> James Sinnamon wrote:
> >Dear list subscribers,
> >
> >At first I thought my command:
> >
> > mount -t nfs 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
> >
> >... had failed.
<snip/>
> >Eventually, I found, to my surprise, that that the 'mount' command
> >had not only withstood all my attempts to smother it, but it also
> >succeeded after all. I don't know whether it took 15 minutes
> >or two hours, but whatever the time lag was, it it had taken far too
> >long. can anyone tell me how to work out what the problem could be?
> >
> >The entry in 192.168.0.6:/etc/exports is:
> >
> > /etc 192.168.0.2(ro)
> >
> >.... where 192.168.0.2 is the nfs client.
>
> Probably, lockd isn't running on 0.6. lockd handles locking, and if
> it's not responding you get these enormous timeouts.
> I suppgest you find out why, but since you're mounting ro then this is
> acceptable too:
>
>
> mount -t nfs -o nolock 192.168.0.6:/etc /mnt/nfs
The option '-o nolock' works fine, but I will need write access also.
lockd not the problem?
--------------------------------
I installed the package, nfs_common, which contains rpc.lockd, only to
to find out that rpc.lockd was NOT necessary because my kernel
(version 2.4.25-1) had a version number greater than 2.4. the
nfs_common script doesn not start rpc.lockd.
So do I need to enable the kernel's lockd capability or is something
else cause the nfs mount to be slow?
I will try running rpc.mount and nfs.mountd with verbose flags turned
on, but any other suggestions would be welcome.
The entry in 192.168.0.6:/etc/exports is still :
/etc 192.168.0.2(ro)
Thanks again.
James
--
James Sinnamon
jps at westnet com auStralia
ph +61 412 319669, +61 2 95692123, +61 2 95726357
Reply to: