Re: nfs setup on woody
On Saturday 03 January 2004 15:34, GCS wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:22:09PM +0000, Richard Lyons
<richard@the-place.net> wrote:
> > yes:
> > /home/richard/ 192.168.0.2(rw,sync)
>
> Thanks. Well, I haven't seen the 'sync' option yet, and it's not
> mentioned in the man page either - but I am not an NFS guru, it can
> be good. Anyway, it may worth a try to remove it, even if my Sarge
> box re-started the nfsd without any warnings with this option.
I have tried it with and without 'sync' (I have no recollection where I
copied it from originally). Also with machine.domain in place of IP.
Also tried (ro) in place of (rw). Same error message each time:
# exportfs -ra
machine.domain:/home/richard: Function not implemented
> Do you have more shares on this machine, or is this the only one in
> the exports file?
It is the only one at the moment. I used the same pattern with various
exports on all three machines previously. The Woody machine was then
running RH8 and the other two are Sid. All used to respond to
# rpcinfo -p
with something like
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
100021 1 udp 32770 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32770 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 32770 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 32768 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 32768 nlockmgr
100005 1 udp 897 mountd
100005 1 tcp 900 mountd
100005 2 udp 897 mountd
100005 2 tcp 900 mountd
100005 3 udp 897 mountd
100005 3 tcp 900 mountd
100024 1 udp 1009 status
100024 1 tcp 1012 status
which is why I expected some 'nfs' and 'nlockmgr' lines rather than
those 'sgi_fam' lines. I can't help thinking this is a problem of the
installation rather than the /etc/exports file. I installed
nfs-common and nfs-kernel-server
but perhaps I am missing something else? Or are there other config
files that could be misconfigured? hosts.allow has my IP listed for
portmap, lockd, mountd, rquotad, statd, and rpc. In any case that
'Function not implemented' suggests something else (I don't know
what!) .
--
richard
Reply to: