Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong -- [WAS: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:17:46 -0600,
"Hoyt Bailey" <hoyt13@wiredok.com> wrote in message
<[🔎] 01c301c3ac63$842801a0$1c5a22d0@blackgold>:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arnt Karlsen" <arnt@c2i.net>
> To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 00:18
> Subject: Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong --
> [WAS:"Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]
>
> > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:49:50 -0600,
> > "Hoyt Bailey" <hoyt13@wiredok.com> wrote in message
> > <[🔎] 004001c3abdb$93aafcf0$e35a22d0@blackgold>:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Alfredo Valles" <alfredo@bioinfo.cu>
> > > To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> > > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 14:02
> > > Subject: Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong --
> > > [WAS:"Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]
> > >
> > > > On Saturday 15 November 2003 2:30 pm, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:17:27PM -0500, Alfredo Valles
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday 14 November 2003 11:23 pm, Tom wrote:
> > > > > > > compared to the taliban and the islamists, I cannot
> > > > > > > believe you are acusing *US* of advocating a theocracy.
> > > > > > > talk about head up the ass.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But talibans and islamists don't spend billions of dollars
> > > > > > a year in weapons.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, they just fund terrorist groups that fly planes into
> > > > > occupied skyscrapers.
> > > >
> > > > I don't like talibans. But what I mean is that if you launch all
> > > > the planes on US against New York city it won't cause 10% of the
> > > > destruction of a single nuclear missile. (I'm sure that US have
> > > > more nuclear missiles than civil plains).
> > >
> > > That just simply isnt true. There may be more than 100,000 civil
> > > aeroplanes in the US. I doubt there is 10% of that number of
> > > missels with Nucular tips.
> >
> > ..those 250 000 planes would need nuclear charges to match those
> > 8000 US nukes. They however easily match a single tactical nuke.
> >
> > > Whatever the number there are likely enough to destroy any country
> > > or series of conturys that start such an exchange. How many have
> > > been fired?=0
> >
> > ..what stops Sissy Boy George from launching a "preventive" strike
> > to prevent an indictment for war crimes and treason under US Law?
> >
> Three things:
> His God.
> His Honor.
> His Rep with the american people.
..uhoh. That leaves trusting the remainder of the command chain.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: