Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong -- [WAS: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:29:02 -0600, 
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote in message 
<[🔎] 1068924542.2597.132.camel@haggis.homelan>:

> On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 13:17, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> > On Friday 14 November 2003 11:23 pm, Tom wrote:
> [snip]
> > > That is, the outcome was indeterminate.  So anybody else who could
> > > have potentially been said to "win" would be equally illegitmate. 
> > > It kind of sucks when you have a country without a president, 
> > 
> > But I heard that there is some evidence of cheating in the elections
> > in Florida in favor of the republicans. So you let the cheaters won.
> > Good example for your citizens.
> 
> And US citizens here lots of nasty things about Castro.  If Castro
> isn't that bad, then maybe GWB isn't either?
> 

..but Castro _is_ bad:  He fails his Command and commits 
Treason, by failing to repress war crime, just like That Other 
Sissy Based on that island.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.