On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:12:49AM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:36:47PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote: > > > > > Upon reading this, I have to agree with you -- having a supposedly > > private message sent to the list could range from mildly annoying to > > outrageously embarrassing. > > > > But then I have to ask -- do some clients automagically CC the poster, > > or are people going to the trouble of CCing manually? > > I hit the g key in mutt. It usually does do CCs. I'm told that there is > a header that people can set to request no CCs. I think you mentionned > something along those lines. I am pretty sure mutt respects that. I > think most of the CCs you are receiving are from borken mail-clients > that don't respect that header. Shouldn't you be hitting the L key in mutt, for 'reply-to-list' instead of g for 'reply-to-all'... Especially considering that the code of conduct for the list: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct says "When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied." Contrary to what the opt-out spammers would have us believe, a failure to request that you _not_ send me something doesn't constitute a request _to_ send it. I believe that when using the reply-to-list function, mutt will respect a mail-followup-to header and CC the person if it's specified. At least I know there's _some_ header that does the trick, because sometimes I hit L in mutt and voila, there's a CC in my reply. Cheers! -- ,--------------------------------------------------------------------------------. > -ScruLoose- | There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters,< > Please do not | and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare. < > reply off-list. | - Blair Houghton < `--------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
Attachment:
pgp4VSvSpjTjc.pgp
Description: PGP signature