Re: Searching for an editor...
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 04:22, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 19:43, Tom wrote:
> > > [Sunday 19 October 2003 19:09] John Hasler:
> > >
> > > > > To start with, it should be graphical, so vim, emacs and the like
> > > > > are no option to me...
> > > >
> > > > What do you mean by graphical? Emacs has menus, icons, cut&paste
> > > > with the mouse, mouse control of the cursor, etc. What is it that
> > > > people mean by a "graphical" editor?
> > >
> > > Well... Built with widgets? :-s
> > >
> > > Somehow, I expected this reply. It's more of a look-n-feel thing. I
> > > don't mind console apps, but for some purposes, I like the "graphical"
> > > approach better. It's not (only) about being able to control things
> > > using the mouse etc.
> > >
> >
> > Its probably not what you are looking for, but on this note there is
> > xemacs which is much more graphical, and there is also a build of xemacs
> > based on gtk (don't know if 1 or 2)
>
> Not to start a flame war, but I don't think XEmacs is more graphical
> than Emacs21 (Emacs20, yes, but not Emacs21).
I don't think I have used emacs21 but I don't remeber, so I can't tell.
I also don't know how their gui comapare.
Do you know the differences (main ones)?
Reply to: