Re: what happened to freeswan?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:28:30PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> [2003.07.15.2304 +0200]:
> > Unfortunately, what they are doing to keep the possibility of the
> > US government trying to take action against them, has caused the
> > mainline kernel developers to refuse to include their work in the
> > mainline kernel.
>
> I haven't followed this at all. Is there a comprehensive link?
If you read the mailing list you'll see many flame wars about this. Also,
it was mentioned on LKML before the competing IPsec was merged too.
>
> > I'm going to be using freeswan for a while also, but I'm going to
> > be helping to test 2.6-test ipsec to make sure it will be useful
> > at 2.6.0. :)
>
> Of course I will do the same. I am interested in using "native"
> stuff whereever possible. However, primarily I need functionality,
> and FreeS/WAN has been providing that. I will and am already testing
> 2.6 IPsec on test boxes, what I meant is that it will take a while
> before I entrust my infrastructure to it.
>
> PS: Please respect Mail-Followup-To. I don't want CCs on mailing
> list posts.
#No Duplicates!
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 32768 msgid.cache
With this, it never bothers me. But yes I'll press "L" instead.
Reply to: