HdV@DTO.TUDelft.NL wrote:
Note also that sarge currently does NOT have a useful security repository. All security updates for testing need to go through sid first, so there is a not insignificant delay before they are apt-getable for testing... Most of the time that isn't too much of a problem as "apt-get source" from unstable usually works if you add deb-src lines for unstable in your source.list .
Duly noted; thanks.So now that I've changed stable to sarge in my sources list, and ran apt-get dist-upgrade and got all the new packages, is it correct now to say "I'm running sarge"? Or is it like half-sarge, half-woody?
-Anthony http://nodivisions.com/