Re: spamassassin lock file in procmail?
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 18:12 GMT, Mark Ferlatte penned:
>
> Well, if you're going to run spamassassin instead of spamd, then it's
> proba= bly a good idea; it will prevent more than one copy of SA
> running at a time, wh= ich will keep it from crushing your mailserver.
>
> SA is _really_ slow and resource intensive when run standalone; I'd
> highly recommend setting up spamd and spamc instead, and then not
> worry about the lock.
>
Actually, I *am* running spamd/c ... so it sounds like the lock file is
unnecessary?
In other words, it sounds like, SA/spamc *do* handle file locking; the
procmail lock is just suggested to keep system load down?
--
monique
PLEASE don't CC me. Please. Pretty please with sugar on top.
Whatever it takes, just don't CC me! I'm already subscribed!!
Reply to: