Re: USB subsystem problems?! or only mouse?
Nick,
the entry I have in my XF86config-4 file are the following:
The first mouse is a logitech on ps2 port, and it works.
The second is the Logitech usb that does not work...
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Option "CorePointer"
Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
Option "Protocol" "PS/2"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "true"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
EndSection
.....
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Logitech MX700"
Driver "mouse"
Option "SendCoreEvents"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
# Option "Protocol" "ExplorerPS/2"
Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "false"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "6 7"
Option "Buttons" "7"
EndSection
As you can see I have the line "device" "/dev/input/mice"...but when I
execute the command "cat /dev/input/mice" and I move, and I use
buttons...nothing happend...no caracters are show..:(
Do you have any ideas..?!
thanks
Lorenzo
Il lun, 2003-10-27 alle 08:08, Nick Hastings ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> * Lorenzo Rossi <lorenzo.rossi-hall@poste.it> [031027 15:57]:
> > ....I'm sorry Nicos...for the reply..I did not see the "to:"
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your suggestions Nicos,
> >
> > I have mounted, as you explain, the usbfs, and now I can see devices
> > with command "lsusb", and also following the path /proc/bus/usb/.
> >
> > I have only 2 usb devices, one is an hub and the other is a usb mouse.
> > The usb mouse, as I said, does not work, but I was not so precise
> > concerning the "does not work"...
> >
> > Under the path "/dev/input/", I have the following devices:
> >
> > event0 event2 js0 js2 mice mouse1 mouse3
> > event1 event3 js1 js3 mouse0 mouse2
> >
> > I think I have set up my mouse correctly for X.
> > Checking the X log files, all seem ok!
>
> Do you have a line like the following in your XF86config-4 file?
> Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
>
> > But the mouse does not move the pointer!
>
> What happens if you
>
> cat /dev/input/mice
>
> and then move the mouse? Does a bunch of stuff spew onto your terminal?
>
> Nick.
Reply to: