On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:50:07PM +0000, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote: > I believe im currently blocked by Spamcop despite not being a spammer... You are not being blocked by Spamcop. Stop thinking this. If you're listed (which you're not, I just checked based on the headers; I'd appreciate the effort if you do a little research next time), you may be blocked by individual sites who happen to use the SCBL as a rejection list. Spamcop advises potential users of the SCBL that it tends to be somewhat agressive (blocking entire /24s when more than one spammer appears in that range) and should *not* be used in this manner. http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/290.html My opinion about RBLs is that if you're going to use them to block based on thier word alone, make it clear in the rejection message that people should email *YOU* about this problem instead of letting the user think it's some third party (usually the maintainer of the RBL). "postmaster" must always accept mail and be regularly checked to comply with the relevant RFCs, make sure people know to email there if there's any questions. -- .''`. Baloo <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system
Attachment:
pgp7SMbVc0fQF.pgp
Description: PGP signature