On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:18:13PM +0100, Gottfried Szing wrote: > Gregory Seidman wrote: > > >Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no > >one has bothered to package it? > > > > > > do you mean xview? i think xv is the old name. xv and xview are different programs. personally i prefer xview, because a) it's faster and less invasive, and b) it's not non-free. xview and its kin of programs provided by the xloadimage package can do everything that xv can afaik. --sean
Attachment:
pgpzzfbbPsdpH.pgp
Description: PGP signature