[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: server layout on LAN [OT]



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 12:18, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> Objective:  need to layout a small LAN using 2 servers and 6 workstns
>
>
> Equipment available:
>
> Server #1:  Sun Sparcstation 20 with 2G HD, 256M RAM running Debian
>
> Server #2:  PIII with RAID 1 (2x9G) and one 20G IDE HD, 512 RAM
> running Debian
>
>
> Services I want the servers to be running and available to the 6
> users:
>
> DNS via Bind9
> Squid Proxy Server
> POP3/IMAP mail (will DL to this box using Fetchmail,Procmail,Exim)
>
>
> So the question is ... on which of the two servers should I deploy
> these programs? Everything on the PIII?

Do you want one of the two computers act as a gateway for internet 
access? If so, it is recommended that you don't do very much on this 
machine but firewall and IP masquerading. I don't know how powerful the 
Sparcstation is, but I guess it'd be a little slower than the PIII 
machine. So you make this the gateway running no services but the ones 
absolutely necessary. All the other stuff, you put on the P3.

> Would you have a different recommendation if I wanted to run a
> website using Apache/MySQL?  Would I need yet another box to do this
> right?

That depends on whether that site should be seen from the outside 'net 
(well, probably ;-) ) and what you intend to do with it. Again, it 
would be best not to expose more than necessary to the outside world. 
So you put Apache on the P3 like the rest of it and directly forward 
the ports for http (and probably https) to that machine; same thing 
goes for the DB server except you certainly don't want anyone to access 
it from outside. As long as the database and the number of hits stays 
low, the P3 can easily handle it alone.

Of course, if you plan to run something slashdotesque, a little more 
oomph in form of separate server machines wouzd be needed... And a good 
inet connection, last thing I heard slashdot had an average bandwidth 
use of 38Mbit/s. But those dimensions are a loooooooooong way down the 
road. Doing it "right" is not cheap and most of the time just overkill, 
but interesting.

- -- 
Embedded Linux -- True multitasking!
TWO TOASTS AT THE SAME TIME!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9vnREeOF0+zcVdv8RAvESAJ9WVr4r2+ypVu9xj94Fam6v1Gdh4QCgj3q6
ZeZ33k6W+Nb2osJ8G0Jx2Bw=
=NF9U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: