Re: BIND alternatives

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: BIND alternatives
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Date: 25 Jul 2002 08:49:02 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87heingbox.fsf@pooh.int>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3D3FB2B2.2010003@shadlen.org>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0207241131200.9871-100000@herbie.shadlen.org> <[🔎] 1027582385.8434.3.camel@atlas> <[🔎] 3D3FB2B2.2010003@shadlen.org>

At 2002-07-25T08:11:30Z, David Wright <ichbin@shadlen.org> writes:

> Said differently: The fact that script kiddies attack the most widely
> deployed software isn't a good excuse for that software. Quite the
> opposite; it's one reason not to use it.

So you're in the process of migrating from Apache to IIS?  :)
-- 
Kirk Strauser
The Strauser Group - http://www.strausergroup.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: BIND alternatives
  - From: David Wright <ichbin@shadlen.org>
- Re: BIND alternatives
  - From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
- Re: BIND alternatives
  - From: David Wright <ichbin@shadlen.org>

Prev by Date: Re: tomcat4 & mod_jk in woody : connect() failed errno = 111
Next by Date: Re: Hotels and debian
Previous by thread: Re: BIND alternatives
Next by thread: Re: BIND alternatives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread