Re: No IRQ known for ...
Colin,
On 24.07.2002 17:40 Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 03:39:21PM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> where it is shown that pin A was routed to IRQ 0 by the driver. So,
I
> think that I can ingnore the kernel message. I am right?
IRQ 0 usually means that interrupt routing failed, so probably not.
How can I set the correct IRQ for it then?
In another message you ask about ACPI; some machines, particularly
newer
laptops (but possibly others as well, I'm not sure) use ACPI to
perform
interrupt routing. I recommend getting 2.4.18 and applying the latest
patches from <http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi/>.
I asked in the hope ACPI could set the correct IRQ for the device
because after googled a bit I found that the ACPI support in kernel
2.4.18 is not so good. I am using an Athlon 1.4 CPU. Perhaps following
your suggestion things become fixed.
Thank you!
Regards,
Marcelo
--
Marcelo Chiapparini
chiappa@centroin.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: