Re: Question on dependencies
> Um, that looks risky. Wouldn't it be safer to rebuild the lilo package
> from woody on a potato system so that it will actually have satisfied
> dependencies?
Yes. This was done to fix a problem with drives over 32gb on an older
machine that accepted it in the bios, but lilo didn't work on.
> apt-get considers unsatisfied dependencies on a system to be very bad.
I consider not being able to install the ssh update to be very bad ;)
I'll grab the .deb and do the uninstall/upgrade/reinstall route.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: