Re: 2.2 vs 2.4 kernels (OT)
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 17:20, Reid Gilman wrote:
> The Debian stable release is that, stable. It is not supposed to have
> the latest and greatest features, if you want to get the 2.4.x kernels
> (which in my experience are perfectly stable) you can, or you can get
> the testing or unstable distro. But that's why Debian has three
> distros.
I am curious, I have heard both explanations at different times
regarding the meaning of stable... some people have said that only
stable versions of software are (or should be) included while others
have suggested that the term 'stable' applies to the
packaging/dependencies
Does debian policy indicate the 'One True Definition' of 'stable'?
Not trying to start flames (I swear!), just curious
-Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: