Re: Pontification: Unfreeze Woody?
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:41:33PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> On Friday 07 June 2002 22:39, John Hasler wrote:
> > It is impossible to comment intelligently on your suggestion without
> > knowing approximately how much longer it will be until the
> > infrastructure situation is resolved.
>
> OK, just to play the idiot here:
> IMHO it wasn't the best thing to freeze woody before those problems were
> resolved in the first place. As I see it, those problems were known
> some time before the freeze happened, probably in hope that the
> problems would be resolved soon. So I'd definitely be pro?-unfreeze to
> stop the apparent hiatus the whole Debian project is on.
The freeze for the last release was a whole lot longer than this one
looks likely to be.
Any hiatus felt by individual developers is entirely up to them;
unstable no longer affects testing, so they're quite free to develop
there, and in fact are probably more likely to do so if testing is kept
frozen and safe.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: