[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian: abandon ship?



On Wednesday 05 June 2002 09:37 am, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> Debian is run by a few hundred programmers who do this for fun.  Not
> profit. Because we do this for fun we choose where to spend our time.
>  For some people the mips architecture and the required hacking is
> fun.  Others are constrained by the hardware available to them (some
> of our developers had m68k only access).
>
> Debian will never make it to perfect 6 month release cycles.  To use
> Debian you must acclimate to apt-get and the "we release every day"
> credo.  Although we call it "unstable" what we really mean is
> "changing".  If you choose to not update then you have a fairly
> stable box.  I wish there was more we could do, but there isn't. 
> Especially now that most of us are not being paid for Debian work
> anymore.  Cutting back to ia32 (x86) would help, but the cost is not
> worth it.  Besides, Debian is one of the few dists out there
> supporting anything other than Sun and ia32.  Removing those arches
> would leave out many of our users and potential users.  The answers
> are not so cut and dried.
>

I certainly appreciate the multiple architecture support of Debian.  I 
have it installed on a powerpc, m68k, and x86 box.  I initially 
installed it on my m68k box, since Debian was the only distribution 
that supported it.  I made the switch to my other boxes because I liked 
the consistency of one distribution and hated the dependency mess of 
rpm.  I have advocated Debian to others in my work place and will 
continue to do so.  

John Schmidt
jas@netbrick.com   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: