Re: OT: performance problems.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:01:26 +0100
Theo Wribe <theo.wribe@telia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:51:19AM +0800, csj wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:11:46 +0100
> > Theo Wribe <theo.wribe@telia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:00:27PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > > It's all about scsi baby...
> > > >
> > > > /dev/sdb:
> > > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.78 seconds =164.10 MB/sec
> > > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.62 seconds = 39.51 MB/sec
> > >
> > > My Western Digital 80G 7200RPM is pretty good too.
> > >
> > > /dev/hdb:
> > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.80 seconds =160.00 MB/sec
> > > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.58 seconds = 40.51 MB/sec
> >
> > Now that's something to get jealous over. How did you manage the
> > additional 20MB over mine (20MB+/sec)? Is it just the RPM's or some
> > other kernel compile option or hdparm paramater? Please don't tell me to
> > RTFM. 20MB/sec is the most I could get from all my fine reading and
> > tweaking. Also, I'm curious: anybody there who's managed to get even
> > half of the theoretical UDMA 100?
> >
> RTFM - Just kidding ;> Thing I did was to compile my kernel with support
> for Intel IDE controllers. Rebooted and got nice preformance. After that
> I ran hdparm -c3 for I/O support in 32bit w/sync but It did just give me
> an increase of 2-4MB/sec. Im pretty happy with the speed overall.
I have AMD Inside.
Reply to: