Re: Searching for Paul Johnson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 11:08:44PM -0500, Gary Turner wrote:
> Amazing. Perhaps being on the system gives me some immunity :) In any
> case, I will still argue that the proper path is to route suspect email
> to an inspection area rather than an arbitrary bounce.
Like a growing number of admins, I'm sick of playing nice guy with
ISPs who harbor spammers. You spam, everyone you serve suffers.
Email me with postmaster@ursine and I'll tell you who you really
should be contacting about this issue, postmaster@yourisp. I have
*zero* tollerance for net-abuse and nearly as little tollerance for
those who do tollerate it.
> plan. Auto dumping mail.com and rediffmail.com, as high a spam rate as
> they have, is not a good bet-- since every once in a while there is a
> legitimate message. It's a pretty simple matter to scan the
Sorry, but anything below 100% legitimate from a direct source is too
low to qualify. If it's legitimate, they'll bitch at thier ISP to
rectify the situation and notify the RBL of the correction, if not,
they start losing customers as more of the net tunes them out.
- --
Baloo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9SRbpNtWkM9Ny9xURAqyXAJ9TYK+CNqrCZCrB4Qs5F3yzdZzwoQCgoUcM
QaIMLNz/TM08ADqYqI4NYAQ=
=I4XW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: