Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:
CW> SpamAssassin takes care of enough of the rest that whatever does slip
CW> through doesn't bother me too much, and I filter rather than bounce so
CW> that I can deal with the very occasional false positive. That said,
CW> these two rules haven't had any false positives for me yet:
Just in the spirit of sharing here's how I use
procmail-spamtrap and Mutt to deal with spam:
In ~/.procmailrc:
## Paul Chvostek's procmail-spamtrap
## http://www.it.ca/software/procmail-spamtrap
INCLUDERC=$PMDIR/procmail-spamtrap
## Marked messages in spamfolder
:0:
* ^X-spamtrap:
$MAILDIR/spam
In ~/.muttrc:
mailboxes +spam
fcc-hook spamcop /dev/null
folder-hook spam 'my_hdr To: <submit.<myspamcopkey>spam.spamcop.net>'
folder-hook spam 'set signature=""; set mime_forward; set move; set editor=""'
folder-hook spam 'macro index ,f <forward-message><enter>\.<enter><send-message><clear-flag>N'
folder-hook spamcop set move
mbox-hook spamcop +ARKIV/spamcop.gz
mbox-hook spam +ARKIV/spam.gz
Just hitting ",f" in the spamfolder on a spam will send it
right off to spamcop in the required form.
Diligently reporting to spamcop appears to have lessened the
amount of spam I receive.
Regards,
Morten
--
"To create man was a quaint and original idea, but to add the sheep
was tautology." (Mark Twain)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org