Re: this post is not off-topic
I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : PONIK@POBOX.SK
(PONIK@PROVER.SK IS ONLY FORWARD FROM PONIK@POBOX.SK).
WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
THANK YOU.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Watson" <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: this post is not off-topic
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:43:13AM -0700, David Wright wrote:
> > I'll ignore the ad hominem. How about a poll at debianplanet?
>
> Because those have always had the power to command what developers do,
> right?
>
> > ( ) No architecture should move forward untill all can move
> > forward together.
> >
> > ( ) i386 and PPC should take priority; other architectures
> > can follow when they're ready.
> >
> > I guess you're confident that the second option would only get 2 votes.
>
> Ah, yes. So the security team will have to support both potato and
> woody, because both will be stable on different architectures. Package
> maintainers will have to support wildly different versions of their
> packages in stable. All this until the other architectures get a new
> stable release - which, if we only cared about raw numbers of users
> rather than developers willing to do the work, would most likely be
> never.
>
> Great. Maybe it's time to fork Debian after all (which, incidentally,
> you're quite free to do).
>
> --
> Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: