Re: Getting a stable LVM for woody
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:50:08AM -0700, Alexander Konovalenko wrote:
> --- Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:07:34AM -0700, Alexander Konovalenko
> > wrote:
> > > I would like to install a more-or-less production quality
> > > version of LVM with woody on i386.
> > I was thinking in the same line :)
> > > Sistina.com says that the latest stable release of LVM is
> > > 1.0.4, while both 1.1-rc2 and LVM2 are beta versions.
> > So you are looking at lvm10
> >
> > > Was version 1.0.4 packaged for Debian by the lvm maintainer?
> > > (Robert (rvdm), are you that maintainer?)
> >
> > Look at changelog.debian in /usr/share/doc/lvm10. It was tracking
> > 1.0.1 up to 1.0.1release-1 then startied to track 1.1. Latest entry
> > say:
> >
> > lvm10 (1.1rc1-2) unstable; urgency=high
> >
> > * Fixed lvmsadc lock bug (Closes: #139169)
> > * Fixed lvm name check bug (Closes: #140957)
> > * lvm is been working fine with debian kernels a while now (Closes:
> > #122753)
> >
> > -- Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@debian.org> Mon, 29 Apr 2002
> > 12:14:20 +0200
> >
> > Considering woody is freeze mode after around May1, this is very new.
> >
> > As usual, he is not blindly following upstream but keep applying
> > local patch. It is second build (1.1rc1-2) With last statement it
> > sounds good to me.
>
> So, if I understand you correctly, your message is that 1.1rc1-2
> is stable enough.
I do not for sure but that is my reading of package builder's thoughts.
> After reading the changlelog (I should've done
> that before) and looking at the list of bugs I tend to agree with
> you. There are some bugs that need to be fixed but no one is
> fatal nor breaks essential behavior of LVM. Let's see how it will
> work in reality.
If you know exactly, file a bu report to BTS. Maintainer may send
update to unstable then you may be able to get it :)
...
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA
See "User's Guide": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/
See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/
"Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net
I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: