[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: where to install openoffice



I typically install OpenOffice to either home, or opt.  I dont think it
matters where you install it.  Then I usually create a script in /usr/bin
called soffice:

#!/bin/bash
/home/OpenOffice/program/soffice &

Why do I put it in /home?  Well, i was switching distros rather frequently
last year before settleing on Debian and home is a seperate part that
never gets formatted.

 --
Arthur H. Johnson II
Catechist, St John Catholic Church, Davison MI USA
President, Genesee County Linux Users Group
Debian GNU/Linux Advocate

On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, martin f krafft wrote:

> hi folks,
>
> i've always installed OpenOffice or StarOffice or whatever into
> /usr/local/apps/{open,s}office or /usr/local/lib/{open,s}office,
> depending on whether the day was even or odd -- as in, there was no
> pattern. now i am installing a couple of new systems and would like to
> do it right.
>
> it seems that these software packages should install into
> /opt/{open,s}office to keep the system in accordance with the FHS.
> however, there's something deep inside me speaking against /opt at the
> top of the filesystem hierarchy. i know it's a standard but i don't
> like it as i believe that these packages *should* really sit under
> /usr/local. but /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/apps are also wrong.
>
> debian does not control /opt and /opt is not part of debian, which is
> a good thing. despite openoffice not being part of debian, i would
> still like for it to be integrated into the system in a logical way.
> so where does it go? /usr/local/opt/{open,s}office?
> /usr/local/{open,s}office?
>
> please don't let this become a lengthy discussion, only post if you
> know the FHS inside out or you know the answer exactly. i don't want
> opinions (sorry if this sounds arrogant).
>
> thanks,
>
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: