I have an older HP LaserJet 4 printer that I got off of ebay, and an equally old UMAX Astra 1200S SCSI Scanner that I also got off of ebay. I forget exactly how much I paid for each, but it was certainly less than retail, and I feel I got pretty good hardware to boot. CUPS works wonderfully with the printer, and Sane/XSane works wonderfully with the scanner. Personally I think SCSI scanners are the way to go. The one I have is significantly faster than the brand new Acer USB scanner I use at work. Granted if you don't already have a SCSI card, this can be a bit of an annoyance, but old adaptec 2940s are pretty cheap on ebay as well. Sean On Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:17:43 +1000 mdevin@ozemail.com.au wrote: > I have decided to purchase a new scanner and printer - especially since > Canon seem unwilling to help development of drivers for their scanners. > I intend to ditch my Canon models to a friend and won't buy Canon again. > > I was considering one of those combo units with the printer and scanner > together - preferably flat bed scanner, so I can do photocopying if > really needed. > > What experiences do people have with these? I have been looking at the > HP ones but the scanner drivers seem heavily in development. > > Is it advisable to stick with laser printers so that you have ps > capability straight off? > > What suggestions do people have? > > Thanks for advice. > Mark. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- OpenPGP key available from http://frodo.net.dhis.org/GnuPG/sjohnson.asc
Attachment:
pgpFscAwSPxXs.pgp
Description: PGP signature