[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: HELP Please ! Can't login .



Aquila wrote:

You should read the other mails on this list.

Anyway you need to boot into single-user mode (append "s" after your
image name at lilo prompt), download the libpam*.deb packages from
http://incoming.debian.org and install them, then reboot.


It's no longer in incoming; but it should be on the mirrors now, so a normal "apt-get update"/"apt-get upgrade" should solve the problem (after rebooting into single-user mode (ie "linux s" at the "boot:" prompt), which will let you log in as root even though PAM is broken).




On 27 Jun 2001 04:07:57 -0700, OSU wrote:

hi,

I am using kernel 2.4.5 with unstable, and was playing around installing new software . But in the process I logged off to take a break and was not able to log back in . I can not login as root or myself . Even before I am able to type the password I get the error " loging incorrect" . I am able to login as root ( with the correct passwd ) if I boot in single user mode. However in this case I can not "su" to any other user or even root . "su" gives the error " su: Modules is unknown " . Based on what i found on the web I tried the following but none worked :
1) ran ldconfig
2)  ran update-modules
3) Mercylessly deleted all pam related packages except those in "required base" which I reinstalled . 4) Tried "adduser" but it failed with "passwd" giving the same error "Module is unknown"

How can I reverse these changes and/or find what package is causing the problem ?

thanking you
b thomas


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

--
---------------------------------------
e-mail: aquila at hypox dot org website: http://aquila.hypox.org geek code: GCS d- s+:--- a-- C++++ ULS++>++++ P+++ L+++>++++$ E--- W++ N+ o? K? w---- O- M-- V-- PS---@ PE--@ Y? PGP- t 5 X- R tv+ b+ DI-- D+ G++ e(++) h! r* y ---------------------------------------








Reply to: