Re: Debian vs. Red Hat
Hello!
Hmm, I actually have never upgraded using apt, but manually from 2.1 to 2.2.
No problems (almost). But I can tell you debian is very well-known for that
a install is only needed "one time in a computer life" and then you can
always upgrade without problems. At least since apt came out.
Kind Regards,
Stephan Hachinger
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ariel Manzur" <hlife@freeweb.com.ar>
To: "Thomas J. Hamman" <hawk3@eagnet.com>; <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: Debian vs. Red Hat
> At 23:42 04/09/2000 -0400, Thomas J. Hamman wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:54:15PM -0500, Wayne Sitton wrote:
> >> Here is the situation, I'm a Debian user. The company I work for, so
far,
> >> will only allow Red Hat as it's Linux OS on it's servers. I need some
good
> >> reasons to justify using Debian. So I'm asking you guys to help me out
with
> >> your opinions, and Documentation, to prove to these computer iliterate
> >> people, that Debian is better.
> >
> >How about the fact that it's more stable and doesn't need to be
> >reinstalled every time there's a new version?
>
> I had to reinstall my debian last time a new version came out..
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org <
/dev/null
>
Reply to: