Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:17:15 +0200 (+0000), J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:12:06 +0200, Konrad Podloucky wrote:
> > > Yeah, but haven't they removed all patented code recently? (At least the
> > > latest beta doesn't contain any Fraunhofer code anymore, afaik)
> >
> > Patents cover algorithms (and thus specific implementations of those
> > algorithms in code). Removing code copyrighted by Fraunhofer doesn't
> > automatically mean the patent is not an issue anymore.
>
> In the US they do. Surely someone in (say) the UK could package it - we
> couldn't have it in the main section, but people living in countries where
> software patents don't exist would be okay.
>
> Adrian
Software patents cover a wider area. They are deffinatly applicable
here in the uk, and it looks like frauhoffer (spl?) think they are
applicable in sweden as well (They are threatening the bladeenc
author/maintainer)
so _if_ that happens it looks like the whole of the europe is out
etc.etc.
Peter Allen
Reply to: