On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:25:25PM -0600, John Galt wrote: > This would be more of an arguement for a MTA being a priority:required > rather than a Depends: on an Extra package. The other question that this There are a selection of MTAs. No given one of them is required, it's just that you ought to have one installed. > begs is: Do these other packages that call sendmail depend on a MTA? Not > RECOMMEND, but DEPEND--if not, why the disparity? BTW you're right that a Policy requires that packages do not depend on any package of lower priority, and in any case a recommendation is almost as strong as a dependancy in dselect (of course, many people use apt these days). > MTA is essential, but I'm doubting that it can be said to be a dependency > of a MUA, more like a recommends: For MUAs which send mail by calling sendmail, it is pretty much a dependancy. -- Mark Brown mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk (Trying to avoid grumpiness) http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ EUFS http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
Attachment:
pgpAWRQ2naG8i.pgp
Description: PGP signature