[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LPRng problem.



On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 08:36:14PM +1000, Bill Shui wrote:
> Hi,
> 	I am having some problems with setting up my LPRng.
> I was wondering if anyone could help me out here.

	If you just install lprng package and have a working printcap file,
	then it should be fine.

> 	I have a HP 6L printer (ie it's a post script printer)

	I cannot agree with you on this. I don't think this is a postscript
	printer.

> 	I just installed the LPRng (latest stable version, and the filters that
> go with it).
> 	I deleted the original lpd and lp* commands (they used to reside in
> /usr/bin and /usr/sbin <--- the lpd)

	Why do you remove the lp stuff?? If you have them already, then it may
	be provided by the old lpd package. You should just install lprng package
	and it will automatically remove the lpd package for you.

> 	and now I couldn't even start up my lpd..

	try to start it from /etc/init.d/lpd

> 	I tried checkpc -f command,
> 	and it prints "/var/run/lpd.printer permisson denied"
> 	I looked into /var/run directory, and there was not a lpd.printer
> present at all... 
> 	So I "touch"ed lpd.printer. and guess what, lpd can start again.
> 	But after I rebooted my computer, the lpd.printer disappeared again.
> 	and also I think I'm having problem with my printcap file...
> 
> it's a total screw up.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 

-- 
____________________________________________________________________________
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1  ___ _               _____
Department of Communications    / __| |_  __ _ ___  |_  / |_  __ _ _ _  __ _ 
University of New South Wales   \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \  / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia               |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: shao@cia.com.au                                                  |___/ 
_____________________________________________________________________________


Reply to: