Re: Mutt dependency on an MTA
*- On 26 Jul, [ Kaa ] wrote about "Mutt dependency on an MTA"
> I have qmail running as an MTA on my potato system. I think I didn't get it
> as a .deb (probably because there isn't one? I am not sure), and just
> downloaded it and installed in /usr/local. Well, yesterday I tried 'apt-get
> install mutt' and guess what? apt refused to download mutt because it
> depends on a "mail-transfer-agent" and such a beast was not to be found in
> dpkg's database. I've tried persuading apt in a variety of ways, but it
> didn't budge: "When I say no, I mean no!". So out of pure frustration I
qmail is available in non-free as a source package(that builds itself
once installed?). This is due to license issues with qmail.
If you want to keep your custom built version you can install the equivs
package. Use the one from unstable/potato as it is a total rewrite from
the one in stable/slink.
This is the Description from the package
"Package: equivs 1.999.7
Circumventing Debian package dependencies
This is a dummy package which can be used to create Debian packages, which
only contain dependency information.
This way, you can make the Debian package management system believe that
equivalents to packages on which other packages do depend on are actually
installed.
Another possibility is creation of a meta package. When this package contains
a dependency as "Depends: a, b, c", then installing this package will also
select packages a, b and c. Instead of "Depends", you can also use
"Recommends:" or "Suggests:" for less demanding dependency.
Please note that this is a crude hack and if thoughtlessly used might possibly
do damage to your packaging system. And please note as well that using it is
not the recommended way of dealing with broken dependencies. Better file a
bug report instead. "
--
Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mechanical Engineering servis@purdue.edu
Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: