Re: PINE Debian Package
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Perhaps a "debian-pine" list is in order. :)
>
> This whole PINE issue is getting blown way out of proportion. Debian's
> policy is clear. Both sides have points but I agree more that Debian
> should not interpret PINE's licensing in a way that would obviously be
> "pushing things" and that may have the potential of bringing Debian into a
> legal battle. IMHO, Debian's PINE maintainer made the right decision,
> even if it does inconvenience PINE users for a little while. However,
> this time of inconvenience will pass; especially as it becomes a "given"
> that PINE will not be distributed as it used to be.
I agree
> I have always respected the opinions of George and Marcus, and still do.
> I ask that we all just give this PINE issue a rest, at least for a little
> while. My middle finger is getting a callous from hitting the delete key
> "d" when deleting all of these PINE posts. :-)
hehe... Ditto.
> And, yes I am a PINE user.
Ditto again
Michael Beattie (mickyb@es.co.nz)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If you don't know where you want to go, we'll make sure you get taken."
-Japanese Microsoft ad slogan translated back into English
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian GNU/Linux.... Ooohh You are missing out!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: