[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "dselect" replacement project ("deity")y



The comments about having to run configure over and over, does this apply 
to the cdrom as well ?  I have a T! at work, so if there is another way 
to install that would be better let me know.

--Jeff

On Sat, 12 Apr 1997, Rick wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> Sorry.  I should have been specific.  I was talking about the ftp install and
> assumed he was too.
> 
> On 12-Apr-97 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
> >
> >> > Yes.  Many have raised the issue of conflicts on install.  The answer at
> this
> >> > point is to run configure over and over.  Each time it will install
> something
> >> > that is needed to settle the conflicts.  The problem is that the selected
> >> > files aren't in dependant order.  Hopefully the new project will address
> this
> >> > problem.  
> >> 
> >> Note that RedHat gets this right, at least on the initial install.  They
> >> prompt for groups of programs that generally would be chosen together
> >> and hide the ugly details unless you ask to pick individual items.
> >> It may be nice to individually pick every file on a unix distribution
> >> but most people have better things to do.  These days you probably
> >> can't buy a disk that is too small to hold a fairly complete
> >> installation. 
> >
> >Okay, apparently Debian also has no problem doing this, BUT if you do an
> >ftp install it will fail because of a bug in dpkg-ftp, Bug#8660 actually.
> >
> >If you use a cdrom or some other mounted media it will be able to
> >correctly identify the package order and install accordingly. If not then
> >please tell me now!
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Jason
> >
> Have a good one.
> 
> - ----------------------------------
> Rick Jones              E-Mail: Rick <rickya@siservices.net> 
> 
> Date: 12-Apr-97                                                                                                Time: 01:13:05
> - ----------------------------------
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> 
> iQCVAwUBM08Z4Qi+Ph+i3TgpAQFopQP/cVbFLV0S2zp4g1ic1hBJo2eQ21sRMf2T
> JpTXXVofD5jIroKw2yBkYoascsArV4Uz97pmb4uLuJBKOGiL42B3+J1ToYjWb60Y
> 5eBT4WKMBoq0JpC6YEQ4hKCzCXooJTtGANOQs+4hpF9vEkA/QAypmaG3248RD8Y/
> 0H2cAMbwTQ8=
> =sYlO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 


Reply to: