[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libXt.so.6



A little more info:

It appears that they are correct, however, I deleted the symlink and
reinstalled.  Still no luck because I get the same error.  I also just
checked ldconfig -v and it shows that it sees libXt.so.6:

/usr/X11R6/lib:
        libXm.so.0 => libXm.so.0.76
        libMrm.so.0 => libMrm.so.0.76
        libXpm.so.4 => libXpm.so.4.7
        libXtst.so.6 => libXtst.so.6.1
        libXt.so.6 => libXt.so.6.0
        libXmu.so.6 => libXmu.so.6.0
        libXi.so.6 => libXi.so.6.0
        libXext.so.6 => libXext.so.6.1
        libXaw.so.6 => libXaw.so.6.1
        libXIE.so.6 => libXIE.so.6.0
        libX11.so.6 => libX11.so.6.1
        libSM.so.6 => libSM.so.6.0
        libPEX5.so.6 => libPEX5.so.6.0
        libICE.so.6 => libICE.so.6.0
        libxview.so.3 => libxview.so.3.2.2
        libolgx.so.3 => libolgx.so.3.2.2

Thanks to those that can help.
Dennis

On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:

> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 97 19:05 PDT
> From: Bruce Perens <bruce@pixar.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org, dpk <dpk@egr.msu.edu>
> Subject: Re:  libXt.so.6
> 
> From: dpk <dpk@egr.msu.edu>
> > I have had problems with multple programs finding 'libXt.so.6'.
> 
> I think this happened to me a while back. It turned out that
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 was a symbolic link to /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0,
> and that second file did not exist. Please go look very carefully and see if
> that is what is happening to you. If that is the case, please remove the link
> and then re-install the "xlib6" package.
> 
> It's not clear to me how the system got this way.
> 
> 	Thanks
> 
> 	Bruce
> -- 
> Bruce Perens K6BP   Bruce@Pixar.com   510-215-3502
> Finger bruce@master.Debian.org for PGP public key.
> PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6  1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3 
> 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: