[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: quota on /var/spool/mail



On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Juergen Nagler wrote:

> > I think your logic has a slight flaw.  It checks to see if the mailbox IS
> > CURRENTLY over quota, not if it WILL BE over quota AFTER the mail is
> > delivered.
> > 
> > In other words, mail comes in, the mailbox is checked to see if it is over
> > quota. It is not so the mail is added. Then next mail arrives. The mailbox
> > is now over quota from the previous mail so no more mail is delivered.
> 
> But how would you then explain this:
> 
> sol:forrest[~]>ll /var/spool/mail/forrest /var/spool/mail/testuser 
> -rw-------   1 forrest  mail        55651 Feb 10 07:46 /var/spool/mail/forrest
> -rw-rw----   1 forrest  mail            0 Feb 10 08:07 /var/spool/mail/testuser
> sol:forrest[~]>quota
> Disk quotas for user forrest (uid 3217): 
>      Filesystem  blocks   quota   limit   grace   files   quota   limit   grace
>       /dev/sda8      56    1000    2000               2       0       0        
> sol:forrest[~]>cat linux-2.2.1.tar.gz > /var/spool/mail/testuser 
> /var/spool/mail: warning, user disk quota exceeded
> /var/spool/mail: write failed, user disk quota exceeded too long.
> /var/spool/mail: write failed, user disk quota exceeded too long.
> cat: write error: Disc quota exceeded
> sol:forrest[~]>ll /var/spool/mail/forrest /var/spool/mail/testuser 
> -rw-------   1 forrest  mail        55651 Feb 10 07:46 /var/spool/mail/forrest
> -rw-rw----   1 forrest  mail       962560 Feb 10 08:11 /var/spool/mail/testuser
> sol:forrest[~]>quota
> Disk quotas for user forrest (uid 3217): 
>      Filesystem  blocks   quota   limit   grace   files   quota   limit   grace
>       /dev/sda8    1001*   1000    2000    none       2       0       0        

The owner is forrest, not testuser....

--
======= 40 4B 36 58 A0 C7 5A 8A  49 E0 39 54 00 20 A3 AA =======
            Daniel Stringfield  <dstringf@fccj.org> 
           Florida Community College at Jacksonville
================================================================


Reply to: