[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: High Load Average



> you have a run away process and/or a memory leak
> 
> ( amd and intel cpu behave slightly differently for 
> ( the same code...

Mmm .. speaking about internal programs, we only have some perl
scripts. Perl is the compiled one, right?

> what apps is running???

We JUST installed the server. I mean, there's nothing hand
compiled, except for Amavis. But it doesn't eat that much CPU
time. In fact, top reveals that everyone uses CPU all the time. A
ipop3d session easily goes for 18%, and a apache or sendmail one
goes for 47% ~ 56%. It is just like everyone is using the machine
at its most.

Look:

91 processes: 89 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 68.7% user, 31.2% system,  0.0% nice,  0.0% idle
Mem:  257856K av, 229104K used,  28752K free, 103600K shrd, 
73192K buff
Swap: 128484K av,      0K used, 128484K free                
86696K cached

  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT  LIB %CPU %MEM  
TIME COMMAND
  170 root       0   0   632  632   516 S       0  5.3  0.2  
6:00 syslogd
13533 root      10   0  1124 1120   780 S       0  4.3  0.4  
0:00 scanmails
12172 jsb        8   0  1192 1192   688 R       0  4.1  0.4  
0:03 top
13532 root       0   0  1552 1552  1200 S       0  0.7  0.6  
0:00 sendmail
  177 root       0   0  4160 4160   804 S       0  0.5  1.6  
2:30 named
11006 www-data   0   0  7632 7632  4776 S       0  0.5  2.9  
0:01 apache
13271 www-data   0   0  4804 4804  4656 S       0  0.5  1.8  
0:00 apache
13673 root      11   0   464  464   296 R       0  0.5  0.1  
0:00 file
11825 root       0   0  1480 1480  1220 S       0  0.3  0.5  
0:00 sshd
12136 rosanak    1   0  1460 1460   972 S       0  0.3  0.5  
0:00 ipop3d
13529 root       0   0  1412 1412  1200 S       0  0.3  0.5  
0:00 sendmail
13627 root       0   0  1396 1396  1160 S       0  0.3  0.5  
0:00 sendmail
  357 root       0   0  1212 1212  1072 S       0  0.1  0.4  
0:06 sendmail
15976 thomas     0   0  5752 5752   972 S       0  0.1  2.2  
0:06 ipop3d
11525 www-data   0   0  4828 4828  4680 S       0  0.1  1.8  
0:00 apache
    1 root       0   0   472  472   400 S       0  0.0  0.1  
0:12 init
    2 root       0   0     0    0     0 SW      0  0.0  0.0  
0:00 kflushd
    3 root       0   0     0    0     0 SW      0  0.0  0.0  
0:03 kupdate
    4 root       0   0     0    0     0 SW      0  0.0  0.0  
0:02 kswapd
    5 root       0   0     0    0     0 SW      0  0.0  0.0  
0:00 keventd
    6 root     -20 -20     0    0     0 SW<     0  0.0  0.0  
0:00 mdrecoveryd
  102 daemon     0   0   492  492   408 S       0  0.0  0.1  
0:00 portmap
  172 root       0   0   760  760   384 S       0  0.0  0.2  
0:00 klogd
  230 root       0   0   440  440   376 S       0  0.0  0.1  
0:00 gpm
  241 root       0   0   560  560   476 S       0  0.0  0.2  
0:00 lpd
  356 root       0   0  1188 1188   832 S       0  0.0  0.4  
0:02 nmbd
  371 root       0   0  1204 1204   532 S       0  0.0  0.4  
0:00 xfs
  380 root       0   0  1548 1548  1320 S       0  0.0  0.6  
0:00 ntpd
  398 root       0   0   848  844   684 S       0  0.0  0.3  
0:00 radwatch
  399 root       0   0   856  856   792 S       0  0.0  0.3  
0:02 radiusd
  438 root       0   0   844  844   788 S       0  0.0  0.3  
0:13 radiusd
  469 root       0   0   616  616   512 S       0  0.0  0.2  
0:00 cron
 6613 root       0   0   440  440   376 S       0  0.0  0.1  
0:00 getty
22159 root       0   0   584  584   500 S       0  0.0  0.2  
0:03 inetd
31116 root       0   0  1224 1224   644 S       0  0.0  0.4  
0:00 smbmount-2.2
31129 root       0   0  1216 1216   744 S       0  0.0  0.4  
0:00 smbmount-2.2
31141 root       0   0  1220 1220   744 S       0  0.0  0.4  
0:00 smbmount-2.2
31159 root       0   0  1220 1220   744 S       0  0.0  0.4  
0:00 smbmount-2.2
31172 root       0   0  1220 1220   744 S       0  0.0  0.4  
0:00 smbmount-2.2


At this moment, Load is a little bit lower (about 4), but idle is
still 0%. Quite weird uh?

If any command output is helpful, please let me know.

  Jordi S. Bunster
<jsb@nautilus.com.br>




Reply to: