[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lightweight caching www proxy



on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:01:23PM +1030, David Purton (dcpurton@chariot.net.au) wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> 
> > on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:42:29PM +1030, David Purton (dcpurton@chariot.net.au) wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi, I'm looking to set up a caching www proxy on my dialup machine.
> > > 
> > > Can anybody recommend a lightweight option here?
> > > 
> > > I looked at squid, but it seems a bit of an overkill for what I want.
> > 
> > Define your needs.  You can configure Squid to your needs (though I find
> > it's best to run it on a dedicated system -- it works better with more
> > memory and disk, and can tend to slaughter a desktop).
> > 
> > wwwoffl really answers a different problem.
> > 
> 
> I use a number of web browsers on my home dialup desktop system, and
> would just prefer it to cache stuff in a slighly more efficient way than
> what it would do if just using each web broswer cache separately.
> 
> Squid seemed to offer much more than what I needed.
> 
> I installed wwwoffle, and it seems to do what I want.
> 
> Anything that I should know, but don't :) ?

I looked at wwoffle.  It's intended for _offline_ browsing, not sure how
it works in online mode.  I found it something of an impediment.  Squid
works fairly well for me, as described above.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/         http://www.kuro5hin.org

Attachment: pgpAnPpiklRL5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: