Re: future of blas/lapack/atlas packages?
Ondrej Certik writes:
> Hi,
>
> thanks Matthias for raising this issue. I am interested in helping with
> this.
>
> We need to maintain the packages in a svn/git repository and I suggest
> we simply create new packges, something like
>
> libatlas3.8-*
>
> or something. We get it compile, we get it to debian and we start fixing
> all potential problems. Let's have both atlas 3.6 and atlas 3.8 and
> users will simply use those, that work. When we get 3.8 in a good shape,
> we may then for example remove the libatlas-* packages and provide them
> with libatlas3.8-* etc.
please don't rename the package without reason. uploads to
experimental should do fine here.
Matthias
Reply to: