Re: A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)

To: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>
Cc: debian-toolchain@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:10:17 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 18205.62137.792843.450306@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071023125233.GA20517@localhost>
References: <[🔎] ff7lub$6lv$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20071022043437.GA463@localhost> <[🔎] 20071022091706.GA7669@localhost> <[🔎] 20071023125233.GA20517@localhost>

Kumar Appaiah writes:

thanks for doing this!

> Depends: atlas3-base | lapack3gf | liblapack.so.3,

looks like the .shlibs files needs to be changed (see below how the
refblas dependencies end up).

>     atlas3gf-base | refblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)
  - From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>

References:
- Re: Status of gfortran transition
  - From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <kamaraju@bluebottle.com>
- Re: Status of gfortran transition
  - From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>
- Re: Status of gfortran transition
  - From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>
- A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)
  - From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>

Prev by Date: Re: A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)
Next by Date: Re: A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)
Previous by thread: Re: A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)
Next by thread: Re: A basic lapack3gf package ready! (was Re: Status of gfortran transition)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread