Re: Upload of cjk?
Hi Hilmar,
> - I've removed font(?) packages (hbf-cns40-b5, hbf-jfs56 & hbf-kanji48) from
> suggests & package description. I guess there no replacements for these
> packages, are there?
No comment from my side
> - I noticed that cjk (in this case c) does not seem to work without
> latex-cjk-chinese-arphic*. Would it make sense to declare a depends? Or do
> we need to keep it on recommends so ends user can choose, which package to
> use?
Puuuh, big it is, I guess recommends is fine, but leave it to Danai to
decide.
> - I tend to drop cjk-latex, after being a dummy/transitional package for >
> 10 years.
Yes!
Best
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info
Fujitsu Research + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien + TeX Live
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Reply to: