[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#870216: tex-common: Old configuration style (still) found in /etc/texmf/fmt.d



Package: tex-common
Version: 6.06
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

Upgraded from jessie (8.9) to stretch (9.1)

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

During install, got the exact same 'Warning: Old configuration style found in
/etc/texmf/fmt.d'
dialog seen in bug 851598. That bug is archived and appears to
claim that it's fixed in tex-common 6.06, but in fact I was
installing tex-common 6.06 and the problem with the extraneous
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/10texlive-math-extra.cnf file still came up.

After poking around 851598 for a while, I ended up doing
'dpkg -P texlive-math-extra' which removed the ancient
file being warned about.

   * What was the outcome of this action?

I did not expect the warning on upgrading.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

That the upgrade would remove any such leftover configuration
files from packages that had been obsoleted and replaced.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.18.24
ii  ucf   3.0036

tex-common recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii  debhelper  10.2.5

Versions of packages texlive-base depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.61
ii  libpaper-utils         1.1.24+nmu5
ii  texlive-binaries       2016.20160513.41080.dfsg-2
ii  ucf                    3.0036
ii  xdg-utils              1.1.1-1

Versions of packages texlive-base recommends:
ii  lmodern  2.004.5-3

Versions of packages texlive-base suggests:
ii  acroread [pdf-viewer]            9.5.5-dmo2
ii  evince [postscript-viewer]       3.22.1-3+deb9u1
ii  ghostscript [postscript-viewer]  9.20~dfsg-3.2
ii  gv [postscript-viewer]           1:3.7.4-1+b1
ii  okular [postscript-viewer]       4:16.08.2-1+b1
pn  perl-tk                          <none>
ii  xpdf [pdf-viewer]                3.04-4

Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on:
ii  dpkg              1.18.24
ii  install-info      6.3.0.dfsg.1-1+b2
ii  libc6             2.24-11+deb9u1
ii  libcairo2         1.14.8-1
ii  libfontconfig1    2.11.0-6.7+b1
ii  libfreetype6      2.6.3-3.2
ii  libgcc1           1:6.3.0-18
ii  libgmp10          2:6.1.2+dfsg-1
ii  libgraphite2-3    1.3.10-1
ii  libgs9            9.20~dfsg-3.2
ii  libharfbuzz-icu0  1.4.2-1
ii  libharfbuzz0b     1.4.2-1
ii  libice6           2:1.0.9-2
ii  libicu57          57.1-6
ii  libkpathsea6      2016.20160513.41080.dfsg-2
ii  libmpfr4          3.1.5-1
ii  libpaper1         1.1.24+nmu5
ii  libpixman-1-0     0.34.0-1
ii  libpng16-16       1.6.28-1
ii  libpoppler64      0.48.0-2
ii  libpotrace0       1.13-3
ii  libptexenc1       2016.20160513.41080.dfsg-2
ii  libsm6            2:1.2.2-1+b3
ii  libstdc++6        6.3.0-18
ii  libsynctex1       2016.20160513.41080.dfsg-2
ii  libtexlua52       2016.20160513.41080.dfsg-2
ii  libtexluajit2     2016.20160513.41080.dfsg-2
ii  libx11-6          2:1.6.4-3
ii  libxaw7           2:1.0.13-1+b2
ii  libxext6          2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii  libxi6            2:1.7.9-1
ii  libxmu6           2:1.1.2-2
ii  libxpm4           1:3.5.12-1
ii  libxt6            1:1.1.5-1
ii  libzzip-0-13      0.13.62-3.1
ii  perl              5.24.1-3+deb9u1
ii  t1utils           1.39-2
ii  zlib1g            1:1.2.8.dfsg-5

Versions of packages texlive-binaries recommends:
ii  python        2.7.13-2
ii  ruby          1:2.3.3
ii  texlive-base  2016.20170123-5
ii  tk [wish]     8.6.0+9

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
  texlive-base/texconfig_ignorant:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
  texlive-base/binary_chooser: pdftex, dvips, dvipdfmx, xdvi


Reply to: