Bug#470118: tetex-base: Transitional package that should depend and/or recommend tex-foo.

[Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>]

On 10.03.08 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Andrew Vaughan <ajv-lists@netspace.net.au> wrote:

Hi,

> > [Sidenote: Looking at why tetex-doc is listed separately, I found
> > another bug. Etch has tetex-doc_3.0.dfsg.3-5etch1 which is a
> > higher version than Lenny (tetex-doc_3.0.dfsg.3-5). 
> > tetex-doc_3.0.dfsg.3-5 is built from tetex-base source package. 
> > Unless someone says otherwise, expect a bug report in 24 hrs].
> 
> Where's the bug? Anyway, it's completely useless to file it, since
> the only action we're going to take on tetex-base and tetex-doc is
> to file a "RM: [RoM]" bug against ftp.debian.og.
> 
IIRC tetex-doc *has* been removed from unstable. The last task in my
list is to check if the bugs sitting on tetex-doc still apply to the
docs of TeX Live and to either close or re-assign them.

H. 
-- 
sigmentation fault